How are we going to return to life in the ‘new normal’?

by | Coronavirus - COVID-19, Coronavirus - Symptoms, Coronavirus - Vaccinations, Immunity

In an important message for primary care and general practices, new modelling, from the Burnet Institute, has highlighted the need to preserve public health measures as a key line of defence against COVID-19 alongside high vaccination coverage.

The COVASIM mathematical modelling also suggests Australia is unlikely to achieve herd immunity with current levels of vaccine hesitancy and the higher infectiousness of new variants.

Burnet Institute Head of Modelling, Dr Nick Scott, said public health measures, such as lockdowns, social distancing, mask wearing and use of QR codes, would need to continue to prevent deaths.

“Without herd immunity, if we stopped taking a public health approach and allowed the virus to spread, it is likely to infect a large proportion of the community,” Dr Scott said.

“Those who are vaccinated would be protected and may only experience mild or no symptoms. But among those not vaccinated – possibly up to 30 per cent of the community – we could see a large number of hospitalisations and deaths, as well as many cases of ‘long COVID’.”

The modelling estimates that in Victoria alone more than 4800 people could die from the virus within 12 months if it were to spread or ‘left to run’ without a public health response.

In summary, the modelling shows:

• Vaccine hesitancy is a critical factor in impeding ourt progress to herd immunity and that is compounded by the emergence of highly contagious COVID-19 variants

• Public health initiatives remain vital in controlling COVID-19, even in vaccinated populations. Without public health measures, thousands of Australians would be hospitalised and die if an initially small outbreak was left to spread through the community unchecked

• Australia requires a high vaccine coverage to return to normal life.

“We found that if the virus enters the community when 60 per cent vaccine coverage has been reached and is left unchecked, we could see 4,885 deaths in Victoria within a year if no public health responses are introduced,” Dr Scott said. “If we get peak vaccination coverage up to 95 per cent, the number of deaths reduces to 1346.”

Conversely, if the virus was more infectious, deaths would remain at very high levels, even if the vaccine was highly efficacious.

Burnet Institute Deputy Director and leading infectious diseases and public health specialist, Professor Margaret Hellard AM said that the modelling was a ‘worst-case’ scenario, showing what could happen if governments decided not to intervene and ‘let the virus run’ even with moderate-to-high vaccine coverage.

“Current COVID-19 strains are far more infectious than the original one. Research is ongoing to determine vaccine efficacy against these variants, but it appears to be lower in a number of variants,” Professor Hellard said. “This means we need much higher vaccine coverage to reduce infections and severe infections. Also there may be occasions when we need to reintroduce public health measures and restrictions to control outbreaks.”

Professor Hellard said with 30 per cent of Australians indicating they do not want to be vaccinated, public health measures must remain if governments want to prevent thousands of COVID-19 deaths.

“I encourage everyone to get vaccinated as soon as they can. This modelling highlights how difficult it will be to return to a normal life. Although vaccinations might not stop every outbreak, they will reduce the likelihood of outbreaks occurring, reduce the need for quarantine and restrictions and save lives.”

COVASIM is an agent-based COVID-19 model developed by Burnet Institute and Institute for Disease Modelling in the USA. It provides governments with more specific and precise data to inform their COVID-19 responses. For more information visit

Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.
Signup to our newsletter
Get all the latest health and lifestyle news straight to your inbox